The story centers on Gaming publishing & co-op teams who turn review discussions into a checklist.
Overview
Background
Core collaborators include Release manager, QA lead, Channel manager, each adding context in a fast-moving thread.
Without a structured capture, decisions blur and follow-through slows.
Intervention
When the thread hits a decision point, the team triggers “@Holycrab_AI summarize release review and output a certification checklist”. Holycrab AI then QA results, channel requirements, risk notes, Align standards -> list items -> assign owners, Checklist + gaps + submission plan.
The distilled output stays tied to the original context for quick review.
- Input QA results, channel requirements, risk notes
- Process Align standards -> list items -> assign owners
- Output Checklist + gaps + submission plan
Deliverables & Impact
Deliverables include Checklist, Gaps, Submission plan, giving the team a clear handoff.
Impact shows up as Alignment time: 2 hrs -> 15 min; Missing items: Lower.
- Checklist Required materials and standards
- Gaps Missing items
- Submission plan Timeline and ownership
Alignment time2 hrs -> 15 min
Missing itemsLower
Launch riskControlled
Example
Prompt: @Holycrab_AI summarize release review and output a certification checklist
Must test: payment + real-name verification
Gap: channel A compatibility report
Plan: submit by Friday